Dave Bondy
Politics • Culture • News
Michigan House to make vote on overturning partial birth abortion ban Wednesday
Republican lawmaker claims Democrats are trying to sneak this legislation through
October 31, 2023
post photo preview

LANSING, Mich -    The Michigan House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on repealing the current partial-birth abortion ban in Michigan.

The package of bills called the "Reproductive Health Act" by Democrats would end the mandatory 24-hour waiting period for women before aborting, allow Medicaid to cover abortion services, and repeal Pubilc Act 328 of 1931 which makes partial-birth abortions illegal in Michigan.

Please consider becoming a paid supporter to support my independent journalism. Quit at any time.

I left the mainstream media to cut through narratives and bias

State Rep. Josh Shriver wrote on Twitter claiming Michigan Democrats are trying to slip this legislation into law without anyone noticing.

TOMORROW, Michigan House Dems are poised to ram through the most extreme abortion legislation in America. They are very devious as well to get what they want. They added it to the agenda on Halloween night at the last minute because they were hoping few people would notice. We are onto their tricks and blowing the lid off their scheme to STOP THEM IN THEIR TRACKS.

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer took to Twitter referencing abortion legislation.

Earlier this year we came together to solve a very scary problem—slaying the state's abortion ban, a "zombie"law that had been on the books since 1931. Unfortunately, other frightening laws surrounding abortion still remain. TRAP laws target healthcare providers with unnecessary, politically motivated regulations that do nothing to protect patients. It's time for them to bite the dust. You know what that means. I'll keep using every tool in my toolbox to put an end to these senseless laws so people can stay in control of their own bodies. Let's keep fighting to roll back these harmful restrictions.

 In 1997 a federal judge struck down a state law banning so-called “partial-birth abortions” as both unconstitutionally vague and an undue burden on a woman’s right of reproductive choice. The decision is the first in the nation to invalidate a ban that closely mirrors legislation being debated by Congress.

U.S. District Court Judge Gerald E. Rosen issued a permanent injunction blocking the ban from taking effect, ruling that law is so vague that it could apply to more than 85 percent of post-first-trimester abortions. The court held that the law therefore imposed an “undue burden” on women seeking to terminate a pregnancy.

The ruling came in response to a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Reproductive Law & Policy. The plaintiffs, who included physicians and clinics, argued that the law’s language is so broad that it could ban virtually every safe method of abortion used after the first trimester.

In 2003 The nine-member US Supreme Court ruled five to four to ban the “partial-birth abortion” procedure in the United States. The court upheld a federal law banning the procedure that was passed by Congress in 2003.

 

The law had been challenged in the courts for lacking an exception to protect women's health, not just their lives.

In 2021, The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) on Wednesday would not acknowledge an existing federal ban on “partial-birth abortion.”

During a hearing of the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on health, Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-Fla.) asked HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra if he agreed that partial-birth abortion is illegal.  

Becerra answered that “[t]here is no medical term like ‘partial-birth abortion’,” and that “[t]here is no law that deals specifically with the term ‘partial-birth abortion’.”

I will keep you updated as I learn more.

community logo
Join the Dave Bondy Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
8
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
September 16, 2026
Gas prices are climbing fast in Michigan, with some stations reaching nearly $5 a gallon. Here’s what’s driving the increase and what could happen next. Michigan GasPrices Economy

Gas prices are climbing fast in Michigan, with some stations reaching nearly $5 a gallon. Here’s what’s driving the increase and what could happen next.

#Michigan #GasPrices #Economy

00:01:17
September 12, 2026
Michigan schools have lost more than 100,000 students in just nine years, but somehow, they’ve added more than 35,000 full-time employees.

Michigan schools have lost more than 100,000 students in just nine years, but somehow, they’ve added more than 35,000 full-time employees.

00:01:21
September 09, 2026
E-bike crashes involving kids are getting attention in Michigan — and now a state lawmaker wants tougher rules. Would new age restrictions go too far? Michigan EBikes news

E-bike crashes involving kids are getting attention in Michigan — and now a state lawmaker wants tougher rules. Would new age restrictions go too far? #Michigan #EBikes #news

00:01:04
September 18, 2026
News they don't want you to see
Friday September 18, 2026
Read full Article
September 16, 2026
News they don't want you to see
Wednesday September 16, 2026
Read full Article
September 15, 2026
post photo preview
DOJ threatens legal action against Ann Arbor Public Schools over student privacy policies
Federal officials say the district has 14 days to change a policy involving transgender students and parental access to education records

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — The U.S. Department of Justice is threatening legal action against Ann Arbor Public Schools unless the district changes policies that federal officials say violate parents’ rights under federal education privacy laws.

In a letter dated Sunday, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said the district has 14 days to address what it described as “substantial noncompliance” with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, known as FERPA, and the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment, or PPRA.

The dispute centers on Ann Arbor Public Schools’ Policy 5011, which addresses transgender and gender-nonconforming students.

According to the Justice Department, the U.S. Department of Education first raised concerns about the policy in July, arguing that it did not provide parents with full access to their children’s education records.

The Ann Arbor Board of Education amended the policy Aug. 26. However, federal officials said the revisions did not substantially change the policy. The Justice Department cited comments made by board members during the meeting as evidence that the changes were intended largely to clarify the policy rather than alter its effect.

The Department of Education determined Aug. 31 that the district remained out of substantial compliance with FERPA and PPRA and authorized the Justice Department to begin enforcement measures, according to the letter.

Federal officials are demanding that the district rescind Policy 5011 or revise it to comply with federal law.

Among the requested changes, the Justice Department wants the district to remove language directing school personnel to privately consult with students about requested names and pronouns. It also wants the district to obtain prior written parental consent before requiring minors to answer questions involving information protected under PPRA.

The federal government is also demanding that parents be given an opportunity to challenge, correct or seek deletion of information in their children’s education records that they believe is inaccurate or misleading. The letter specifically references records involving changes to a student’s name or gender markers and reports concerning a student’s legal name or gender.

The Justice Department also directed the district to review its policies and practices to ensure parents can inspect their children’s education records and exercise their rights under federal law.

If the district does not comply within the 14-day deadline, the Justice Department said the federal government could file a civil lawsuit and take other enforcement action related to conditions attached to federal education funding.

“This letter constitutes a formal demand and a final opportunity to cure before litigation is initiated,” the Justice Department wrote.

The letter was signed by Harmeet K. Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

The documents provided do not include a response from Ann Arbor Public Schools to the latest Justice Department demand.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals