Dave Bondy
Politics • Culture • News
Government pays out milions for vaccine injuries
Did you know this was happening?
January 13, 2024
post photo preview

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) as a no-fault alternative to the traditional tort system. VICP provides compensation to individuals found to be injured by certain vaccines. Even without a formal finding, petitioners may still receive compensation through settlements.

 

 

The program was created in response to lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers and healthcare providers that posed a threat to vaccine availability and vaccination rates. VICP started accepting petitions in 1988.

In 2023 the U.S. government paid out $173,842,001.56 to 885 people.

Click here to read the latest report released by the government on payouts in this program.

The following is a chart of all of the payouts dating back to 1989.

It’s important to note COVID vaccine injuries are not covered as part of this program. The United States does have a program to compensate for COVID vaccine injuries but they are not releasing a lot of information about payouts.

After receiving his first set of vaccines, two-month-old Alexander experienced a severe seizure leading to cardiorespiratory arrest and irreversible brain damage, resulting in his tragic death. The parents, devastated and initially denied by the doctor, embarked on a quest for answers. Despite skepticism from medical professionals, an independent autopsy, expert testimonies, and legal battles in the Vaccine Injury Court proved the link between the vaccines and the tragic outcome. Ultimately, they were awarded $250,000 in recognition of the vaccine-related injury and loss.

Learn more about Alexander’s case here.

The following are the vaccines covered in the government program that is offering payouts:

Note: Herpes zoster (shingles) vaccine is not a VICP-covered vaccine.

What vaccine liability protection is afforded to vaccine manufacturers and administrators?

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) is an alternative to the tort system for resolving vaccine injury petitions. Whether a vaccine manufacturer or administrator is afforded the liability protections of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, (the Act) depends upon whether the vaccine is covered under the VICP.

Under the Act, persons with petitions of vaccine-related injuries or deaths resulting from covered vaccines must first exhaust their remedies under the VICP before they can pursue legal actions against vaccine manufacturers or administrators.

To exhaust the remedies available under the VICP and pursue a legal action against a vaccine manufacturer or administrator outside of the VICP, a VICP petitioner must either withdraw his or her petition (if the special master of the U. S. Court of Federal Claims (Court) has failed to issue a decision or the Court has failed to enter judgment within the time provided by the Act) or reject the judgment under the VICP.

Although the Act provides liability protections to vaccine manufacturers and vaccine administrators who administer covered vaccines in many circumstances, these protections are not absolute.

There are instances when a vaccine manufacturer or administrator who gives a covered vaccine is not protected from liability by the Act, such as when an individual files a petition and is requesting damages of $1,000 or less. In this case, a civil suit against a vaccine manufacturer or an administrator may be permitted to be filed in state or federal court without first filing a petition in the VICP.

In addition, if the VICP has paid a petitioner for a vaccine-related injury, the VICP may be able to pursue its own action against a vaccine manufacturer or administrator using its subrogation rights.

Did any of you know this program even existed? I would not be allowed to discuss this program on Facebook or even TikTok.

 

community logo
Join the Dave Bondy Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
8
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Gas prices are climbing fast in Michigan, with some stations reaching nearly $5 a gallon. Here’s what’s driving the increase and what could happen next. Michigan GasPrices Economy

Gas prices are climbing fast in Michigan, with some stations reaching nearly $5 a gallon. Here’s what’s driving the increase and what could happen next.

#Michigan #GasPrices #Economy

00:01:17
September 12, 2026
Michigan schools have lost more than 100,000 students in just nine years, but somehow, they’ve added more than 35,000 full-time employees.

Michigan schools have lost more than 100,000 students in just nine years, but somehow, they’ve added more than 35,000 full-time employees.

00:01:21
September 09, 2026
E-bike crashes involving kids are getting attention in Michigan — and now a state lawmaker wants tougher rules. Would new age restrictions go too far? Michigan EBikes news

E-bike crashes involving kids are getting attention in Michigan — and now a state lawmaker wants tougher rules. Would new age restrictions go too far? #Michigan #EBikes #news

00:01:04
News they don't want you to see
Wednesday September 16, 2026
Read full Article
September 15, 2026
post photo preview
DOJ threatens legal action against Ann Arbor Public Schools over student privacy policies
Federal officials say the district has 14 days to change a policy involving transgender students and parental access to education records

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — The U.S. Department of Justice is threatening legal action against Ann Arbor Public Schools unless the district changes policies that federal officials say violate parents’ rights under federal education privacy laws.

In a letter dated Sunday, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said the district has 14 days to address what it described as “substantial noncompliance” with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, known as FERPA, and the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment, or PPRA.

The dispute centers on Ann Arbor Public Schools’ Policy 5011, which addresses transgender and gender-nonconforming students.

According to the Justice Department, the U.S. Department of Education first raised concerns about the policy in July, arguing that it did not provide parents with full access to their children’s education records.

The Ann Arbor Board of Education amended the policy Aug. 26. However, federal officials said the revisions did not substantially change the policy. The Justice Department cited comments made by board members during the meeting as evidence that the changes were intended largely to clarify the policy rather than alter its effect.

The Department of Education determined Aug. 31 that the district remained out of substantial compliance with FERPA and PPRA and authorized the Justice Department to begin enforcement measures, according to the letter.

Federal officials are demanding that the district rescind Policy 5011 or revise it to comply with federal law.

Among the requested changes, the Justice Department wants the district to remove language directing school personnel to privately consult with students about requested names and pronouns. It also wants the district to obtain prior written parental consent before requiring minors to answer questions involving information protected under PPRA.

The federal government is also demanding that parents be given an opportunity to challenge, correct or seek deletion of information in their children’s education records that they believe is inaccurate or misleading. The letter specifically references records involving changes to a student’s name or gender markers and reports concerning a student’s legal name or gender.

The Justice Department also directed the district to review its policies and practices to ensure parents can inspect their children’s education records and exercise their rights under federal law.

If the district does not comply within the 14-day deadline, the Justice Department said the federal government could file a civil lawsuit and take other enforcement action related to conditions attached to federal education funding.

“This letter constitutes a formal demand and a final opportunity to cure before litigation is initiated,” the Justice Department wrote.

The letter was signed by Harmeet K. Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

The documents provided do not include a response from Ann Arbor Public Schools to the latest Justice Department demand.

Read full Article
September 14, 2026
News they don't want you to see
Monday September 14, 2026
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals