Dave Bondy
Politics • Culture • News
Biden's Latest Student Debt Forgiveness Plan: A Boon for the Well-Off at Taxpayer Expense
Information you need to read
April 13, 2024
post photo preview

WASHINGTON D.C. - In a controversial move, President Joe Biden has launched another bid to cancel student loan debt, this time for up to 25 million borrowers, despite a previous attempt being struck down by the Supreme Court. The new plan, armed with a different legal basis, aims to avoid the pitfalls of the past—but not without raising sever

e concerns about its fairness and financial wisdom.

Could you take a look at the chart below? 750,000 people making avg of $312k/year getting the bulk of the $$ relief

The administration proposes to slash student loan balances by $5,000 to $20,000, with some borrowers seeing their debts erased entirely. While this might sound like a win for economic growth, as consumer spending could potentially increase, the reality is more complicated. The plan is expected to cost a staggering $559 billion in lost government revenue over the next decade, adding substantially to the national deficit without any strategy to recoup these losses.

Support my independent journalism. Become a subscriber for $5 a month, you can quit at anytime. If you are aleady a subscriber I thank you for supporting my mission.

Critics argue that the plan disproportionately benefits the well-off—predominantly those who pursued higher education and are thus more likely to land higher-paying jobs. In essence, a significant portion of this financial relief will go to individuals within the top 60% of income earners, not those at the lower end of the spectrum who arguably need it most.

This approach has sparked outrage among fiscal conservatives and even moderate Democrats, who see it as a misallocation of precious taxpayer dollars. They argue that the funds could be better spent on programs that directly assist vulnerable groups, such as low-income families, working parents, or older workers facing healthcare challenges. Instead, the Biden administration's plan seems to cater to a demographic that is less in need of financial aid, raising questions about the equity and sustainability of such sweeping debt forgiveness.

Make sure your friends see this. They may not know the truth.

Moreover, there needs to be an accompanying proposal to reform the sprawling student loan system, which means the cycle of borrowing and the ballooning national debt could continue unabated. This could set a precedent for future administrations to grant similar debt relief, turning higher education into an expensive entitlement funded by taxpayers.

As President Biden prepares for re-election, his push to wipe out student debt is seen by many as a politically motivated move to secure votes from college-educated Americans, rather than a genuine effort to reform education financing. The plan has been lambasted by opponents as "lawless" and an irresponsible gamble with the nation's fiscal future, favoring electoral gains over economic prudence. Critics warn that this sets a dangerous precedent, where fiscal responsibility is sidelined for populist policies that appeal to affluent voters.

Make sure all of your friends see this. Share this out everywhere.

 

community logo
Join the Dave Bondy Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
September 16, 2026
Gas prices are climbing fast in Michigan, with some stations reaching nearly $5 a gallon. Here’s what’s driving the increase and what could happen next. Michigan GasPrices Economy

Gas prices are climbing fast in Michigan, with some stations reaching nearly $5 a gallon. Here’s what’s driving the increase and what could happen next.

#Michigan #GasPrices #Economy

00:01:17
September 12, 2026
Michigan schools have lost more than 100,000 students in just nine years, but somehow, they’ve added more than 35,000 full-time employees.

Michigan schools have lost more than 100,000 students in just nine years, but somehow, they’ve added more than 35,000 full-time employees.

00:01:21
September 09, 2026
E-bike crashes involving kids are getting attention in Michigan — and now a state lawmaker wants tougher rules. Would new age restrictions go too far? Michigan EBikes news

E-bike crashes involving kids are getting attention in Michigan — and now a state lawmaker wants tougher rules. Would new age restrictions go too far? #Michigan #EBikes #news

00:01:04
A doctor breaks the silence about his truth about hospitals

A doctor breaks the silence about his truth about hospitals.

Dave all of your followers can get here through Rumble just let them know to press the red"join" button

September 13, 2026
September 18, 2026
News they don't want you to see
Friday September 18, 2026
Read full Article
September 16, 2026
News they don't want you to see
Wednesday September 16, 2026
Read full Article
September 15, 2026
post photo preview
DOJ threatens legal action against Ann Arbor Public Schools over student privacy policies
Federal officials say the district has 14 days to change a policy involving transgender students and parental access to education records

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — The U.S. Department of Justice is threatening legal action against Ann Arbor Public Schools unless the district changes policies that federal officials say violate parents’ rights under federal education privacy laws.

In a letter dated Sunday, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said the district has 14 days to address what it described as “substantial noncompliance” with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, known as FERPA, and the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment, or PPRA.

The dispute centers on Ann Arbor Public Schools’ Policy 5011, which addresses transgender and gender-nonconforming students.

According to the Justice Department, the U.S. Department of Education first raised concerns about the policy in July, arguing that it did not provide parents with full access to their children’s education records.

The Ann Arbor Board of Education amended the policy Aug. 26. However, federal officials said the revisions did not substantially change the policy. The Justice Department cited comments made by board members during the meeting as evidence that the changes were intended largely to clarify the policy rather than alter its effect.

The Department of Education determined Aug. 31 that the district remained out of substantial compliance with FERPA and PPRA and authorized the Justice Department to begin enforcement measures, according to the letter.

Federal officials are demanding that the district rescind Policy 5011 or revise it to comply with federal law.

Among the requested changes, the Justice Department wants the district to remove language directing school personnel to privately consult with students about requested names and pronouns. It also wants the district to obtain prior written parental consent before requiring minors to answer questions involving information protected under PPRA.

The federal government is also demanding that parents be given an opportunity to challenge, correct or seek deletion of information in their children’s education records that they believe is inaccurate or misleading. The letter specifically references records involving changes to a student’s name or gender markers and reports concerning a student’s legal name or gender.

The Justice Department also directed the district to review its policies and practices to ensure parents can inspect their children’s education records and exercise their rights under federal law.

If the district does not comply within the 14-day deadline, the Justice Department said the federal government could file a civil lawsuit and take other enforcement action related to conditions attached to federal education funding.

“This letter constitutes a formal demand and a final opportunity to cure before litigation is initiated,” the Justice Department wrote.

The letter was signed by Harmeet K. Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

The documents provided do not include a response from Ann Arbor Public Schools to the latest Justice Department demand.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals