SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF - Billionaire Elon Musk has suggested that Google's omission of search functions related to the assassination attempt against former President Trump may be improper.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b4a2/5b4a20c6410f32b480562b95a3fd105f394c35bd" alt=""
Musk highlighted on social media that Google Search's autocomplete feature did not include results pertaining to the July 13 shooting. Google has denied any actions to limit the results. Musk's posts questioned if this constituted "election interference" and warned that Google could be in significant trouble if found to be interfering with the election.
I walked away from the mainstream media to fight the narratives and bias. Sign up as a paid subscriber for only $5 a month to help my mission. You can quit at anytime.
Also, when you Google Donald Trump, Google will automatically give you news about Kamala Harris. See picture below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0b15/b0b15b3ad791ac3ce1752faa105a8717e650f5e3" alt=""
Ana Mostarac the Vice President of Google Search released the following statement:
I'm the VP of Search at Google ($5.2M TC). I’m devastated to see the accusations regarding the reliability and accuracy of our product in relation to the upcoming presidential election. People trust Google Search to give them accurate answers and to provide the best links to explore on the web. It’s an exciting time for Search. We're seeing positive Search query growth in all of our major markets. People’s information needs continue to grow, so we’ll keep evolving and improving Search. However, it seems we need to recalibrate what we mean by accurate. What is accurate is subjective and the pursuit of accuracy can get in the way of getting things done. You can be assured that our team is working hard to ensure that we don’t let our reverence for accuracy be a distraction that gets in the way of our vision for the future.
A new study from the Media Research Center (MRC) claims that Google has interfered with major U.S. elections 41 times over the past 16 years. According to MRC Free Speech America vice president Dan Schneider and editor Gabriela Pariseau, Google's actions have consistently harmed candidates who posed a threat to its preferred left-wing candidates. They argue that Google's influence on information technology and its involvement in political affairs has been significant since 2008, with its impact becoming more pronounced after the 2016 election.
The MRC report suggests that Google executives have admitted to using the company's vast resources to promote leftist values. Despite these allegations, Google has denied the claims, stating it has a clear business incentive to maintain neutrality and that it employs safeguards to ensure unbiased and accurate search results.