Dave Bondy
News • Politics • Culture
This is a place where you can get unbiased, no narrative, keeping it real content.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
September 30, 2024
Students at Houghton Lake, Michigan High school walk out of class in protest of Title 9 changes.

Students at Houghton Lake, Michigan High school walk out of class in protest of Title 9 changes.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
December 16, 2024
Heartless Thief Steals Donations Meant for Child with Cancer in Michigan

Heartless Thief Steals Donations Meant for Child with Cancer in Michigan. You can donate here--- https://shorturl.at/X7Xvz

00:06:47
December 11, 2024
$100 million of your tax dollars possibly go to University of Michigan

Lawmakers are discussing giving $100 million of your tax dollars to the University of Michigan for a supercomputer project. But did you know that U-M is sitting on a nearly $19 billion endowment? Rep. Fink brought up this concern during an appropriations hearing this morning. Learn more: https://www.mackinac.org/blog/2024/michigan-development-program-not-a-pretty-site

00:01:20
December 08, 2024
New exercise routine

This was my son’s idea

00:00:12
post photo preview
December 11, 2024
DEAL ALERT

If you are not a paid subscriber lock in at $5 a month before it goes up to $6 in January.
Also, beginning in January only paid subscribers will have access to my live shows and a special new Friday night show.
Become a paid supporter now to help me keep it real.

December 08, 2024
IMPORTANT REMINDER

Beginning on January 1st, my shows will be on Thursday and Sunday for paid supporters only. Also, there will be an extra show on Friday evenings that will also be for paid subscribers only. If you are not a paid subscriber, become one now and lock in for $5 a month forever. You can quit at any time, but I hope you won't because you are supporting my independent journalism.
Click become a supporter below to sign up!!

News they don't want you to see
Thursday December 20, 2024

 

 

 
 

POLAND - Poland is reportedly the first European Union (EU) nation to mandate firearms training for schoolchildren. Per DW, these firearms courses will be “compulsory for primarly schoolchildren in preparation of a potential Russian attack.”

Firearms lessons are now compulsory for schoolchildren - even at a young age. This is how Poland is preparing itself for a potential Russian attack. The children are enjoying it, and their parents feel proud.

If you think Poland is based, it’s because they’re anti-Kremlin and remember how Russians treated them. (Thank NATO, however imperfect, too!) Soviet horrors are still very raw to Poles. Poland, like my ancestral homeland Lithuania, is all too familiar with Russian occupation—especially the Soviet variant that spanned five decades. Not to mention Nazi occupation before that.

Although I’m a first-generation American, friends here tell me firearms lessons used to be common in grade school. While less prevalent today - due to gun control efforts, media fear-mongering, and increased urbanization - these courses can still be found in parts of the South, Mountain West, and in Alaska. But seeing Europe jump on this trend, despite having no Second Amendment enshrined in their individual constitutions, is wonderful to see. Click here to read more.

 

WASHINGTON D.C. -On December 6, 2024, a federal judge ordered the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to release documents related to the emergency use authorisation of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. These documents had been hidden from public view.

The legal battle traces back to September 2021, when attorney Aaron Siri filed a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) on behalf of the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency. The plaintiffs sought access to the vast trove of documents the FDA relied on to approve Pfizer's vaccine.

Initially, the FDA proposed a slow release schedule. In November 2021, the agency stated it would release just 500 pages per month—a pace that would have stretched the full disclosure process to 75 years.

However, in January 2022, District Judge Mark Pittman of Texas rejected the FDA’s proposal, ordering the agency to expedite its release to 55,000 pages per month, aiming to complete the disclosure of all 450,000 pages by August 2022.

As the documents trickled out, researchers began uncovering glaring gaps that prevented a systematic review of the data. These gaps fueled suspicions about what else the FDA might be withholding. Click here to read more.

 

COLUMBUS, OH - An Ohio school district will pay nearly half a million dollars to a teacher who was forced to resign after she said she could not use trans-identifying students’ new names and pronouns due to her Christian faith, The Daily Wire has learned.

English teacher Vivian Geraghty, 26, won a $450,000 settlement from the Jackson Local School District south of Columbus, her legal team announced Wednesday. She will not be returning to work for the district.

Two years ago, Geraghty was unceremoniously fired by Jackson Memorial Middle School when two students asked Geraghty to use new names that aligned “with their new gender identities rather than their legal names.” One of the students also requested that teachers use a preferred pronoun that did not reflect the student’s biological sex, her lawsuit said.

Geraghty went to the principal in hopes of reaching a solution, but the principal and his superior, the director of curriculum, instruction, and assessment, told her “she would be required to put her beliefs aside as a public servant,” according to the lawsuit. She was allegedly accused of insubordination and told that continuing to teach without participating in the students’ gender transitions would “not work in a district like Jackson.” Click here to read more.

 

SACRAMENTO, CALIF - WASHINGTON (TNND) — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday approved a California regulation to phase out the sale of gas-powered cars.

The California Air Resources Board adopted the "Advanced Clean Cars II" in 2022, which mandated all vehicles sold in California from 2035 onward produce zero emissions. The rule required a waiver from federal regulators under the Clean Air Act.

EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan granted that waiver Wednesday, allowing the state to gradually roll out its zero-emission plan over the next 11 years. The rollout will require at least 35% of 2026 model year vehicles to be zero-emission vehicles or plug-in hybrids.

“California has longstanding authority to request waivers from EPA to protect its residents from dangerous air pollution coming from mobile sources like cars and trucks,” Ragan said. "Today’s actions follow through on EPA’s commitment to partner with states to reduce emissions and act on the threat of climate change.”

The American Petroleum Institute, an oil and gas trade association, issued a scathing statement Wednesday in response to the waiver urging President-elect Donald Trump to reverse course when his administration takes control in January. Click here to read more.

 

LANSING, Mich - The lame duck session in Lansing is proving to live up to its name as Democrats lose the last bit of control over their party in the waning days of their majority power.

State Sen. Sylvia Santana (D-Detroit) joined Rep. Karen Whitsett (D-Detroit) on Wednesday. Both said they will not attend Wednesday’s scheduled session in Lansing. Rep. Whitsett said on Tuesday night she would not show up until serious issues that impact her constituents are taken up by Democratic leadership.

Whitsett’s announcement came a day after outgoing Michigan Democratic Party Chair Lavora Barnes sent a scathing email blasting Republicans for not showing up to work. “After walking away from their jobs last week, the question remains as to whether they’ll show up this week, leaving millions of Michiganders unsure if they’re paying their representatives to sit on their hands,” Barnes wrote.

Republicans regained control of Michigan’s House on Nov. 5. They take office on Jan 1.

Michigan House Speaker Joe Tate (D-Detroit) could enact a chamber rule that allows the sergeant-at-arms to bring the lawmakers back. Click here to read more.

Read full Article
December 18, 2024
post photo preview
Supreme Court to Hear TikTok's Appeal Against U.S. Ban as Deadline Nears
What this means for users

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court announced on Wednesday that it will hear TikTok's appeal challenging a federal law that could ban the popular social media app in the United States unless its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, divests ownership. The expedited hearing is scheduled for Jan. 10, just nine days before the law is set to take effect.

The bipartisan legislation, signed into law by President Joe Biden earlier this year, cites national security concerns about TikTok’s access to data from its 170 million American users and the potential for content manipulation. The law mandates that TikTok be sold to a U.S. company by Jan. 19 or face removal from app stores and hosting services, effectively barring its use.

Click here to support my independent journalism by becoming a paid subscriber for only $5 a month. I can’t do this work without all of you. You can quit at anytime.

 

 

TikTok and ByteDance argue the law violates First Amendment free speech protections and have requested an emergency injunction from the Supreme Court to halt enforcement. The companies warn that a ban would devastate TikTok’s U.S. operations, causing it to lose a significant portion of its user base, advertisers, and content creators.

In a statement, TikTok expressed optimism about the upcoming court hearing, saying, “We believe the Court will find the TikTok ban unconstitutional so the over 170 million Americans on our platform can continue to exercise their free speech rights.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit previously upheld the law, supporting the government’s national security arguments. The court emphasized that protecting Americans from foreign adversaries outweighs potential free speech claims.

The Justice Department has defended the legislation, warning of the “immense depth and scale” of the national security threat posed by TikTok. Critics of the law, including TikTok, argue that it represents a significant departure from the U.S. tradition of championing an open internet.

b9cp53mwR34

Adding a political twist, President-elect Donald Trump, who had attempted to ban TikTok during his first term, has reversed his stance. Trump recently expressed support for TikTok, saying he has “a warm spot” for the platform and plans to reevaluate the ban upon taking office on Jan. 20.

The court’s decision to hear arguments underscores the urgency of the issue, given the impending Jan. 19 deadline. The case also highlights broader debates over the scope of government power in regulating foreign-owned technology platforms and protecting national security without infringing on constitutional rights.

TikTok’s appeal has drawn significant attention amid heightened U.S.-China tensions, with both nations imposing restrictive measures on each other’s technology industries. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future actions against other foreign-owned apps and reshape the digital landscape in the United States.


Read full Article
December 18, 2024
post photo preview
Supreme Court to Hear TikTok's Appeal Against U.S. Ban as Deadline Nears
What this means for users

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court announced on Wednesday that it will hear TikTok's appeal challenging a federal law that could ban the popular social media app in the United States unless its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, divests ownership. The expedited hearing is scheduled for Jan. 10, just nine days before the law is set to take effect.

The bipartisan legislation, signed into law by President Joe Biden earlier this year, cites national security concerns about TikTok’s access to data from its 170 million American users and the potential for content manipulation. The law mandates that TikTok be sold to a U.S. company by Jan. 19 or face removal from app stores and hosting services, effectively barring its use.

Click here to support my independent journalism by becoming a paid subscriber for only $5 a month. I can’t do this work without all of you. You can quit at anytime.

 

 

TikTok and ByteDance argue the law violates First Amendment free speech protections and have requested an emergency injunction from the Supreme Court to halt enforcement. The companies warn that a ban would devastate TikTok’s U.S. operations, causing it to lose a significant portion of its user base, advertisers, and content creators.

In a statement, TikTok expressed optimism about the upcoming court hearing, saying, “We believe the Court will find the TikTok ban unconstitutional so the over 170 million Americans on our platform can continue to exercise their free speech rights.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit previously upheld the law, supporting the government’s national security arguments. The court emphasized that protecting Americans from foreign adversaries outweighs potential free speech claims.

The Justice Department has defended the legislation, warning of the “immense depth and scale” of the national security threat posed by TikTok. Critics of the law, including TikTok, argue that it represents a significant departure from the U.S. tradition of championing an open internet.

b9cp53mwR34

Adding a political twist, President-elect Donald Trump, who had attempted to ban TikTok during his first term, has reversed his stance. Trump recently expressed support for TikTok, saying he has “a warm spot” for the platform and plans to reevaluate the ban upon taking office on Jan. 20.

The court’s decision to hear arguments underscores the urgency of the issue, given the impending Jan. 19 deadline. The case also highlights broader debates over the scope of government power in regulating foreign-owned technology platforms and protecting national security without infringing on constitutional rights.

TikTok’s appeal has drawn significant attention amid heightened U.S.-China tensions, with both nations imposing restrictive measures on each other’s technology industries. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future actions against other foreign-owned apps and reshape the digital landscape in the United States.


Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals