Dave Bondy
Politics • Culture • News
Trump Declares Biden Pardons ‘Void’ Over Autopen Claims, Reviving Debate Over Signature Device
Autopen’s White House Legacy Faces New Scrutiny as Trump Challenges Biden’s Clemency Moves
March 17, 2025
post photo preview

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump ignited a political firestorm early Monday, declaring that pardons issued by his predecessor, Joe Biden, are “void, vacant, and of no further force or effect” because they were allegedly signed using an autopen. In a late-night post on Truth Social, Trump targeted Biden’s clemency for members of the House select committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, claiming the automated signatures invalidated the acts.

“The ‘Pardons’ that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID … because of the fact that they were done by Autopen,” Trump wrote shortly after midnight. He further alleged, without evidence, that Biden “did not know anything about them,” suggesting aides acted unilaterally. The post, reported by NBC News, also featured a meme replacing Biden’s official portrait with an autopen image, amplifying Trump’s mockery.

The claim hinges on the autopen, a mechanical device that replicates a person’s signature, a tool with a decadeslong history in the White House. Its use dates back to at least the 1950s, when President Dwight Eisenhower reportedly employed it for routine correspondence, according to a 2011 report on its legal precedent. The device gained prominence in 2005 when the Department of Justice affirmed its legality for signing legislation, ruling that President George W. Bush’s use of an autopen to sign a bill while abroad was constitutionally sound. Barack Obama became the first president to use it for legislation in 2011, signing a Patriot Act extension from France.

Support my Independent Journalism by becoming a paid subscriber for $6 a month. I can’t do this work without you. You can stop at anytime. Help me to Keep it Real.

 

 

Trump’s assertion that autopen use nullifies pardons lacks legal grounding, experts say. The Constitution grants presidents broad pardon power under Article II, Section 2, and no court has ruled that an autopen signature invalidates such acts, per a Business Standard analysis published Monday. Biden’s administration did use the device, including for a 2022 Federal Aviation Administration funding bill, but went to lengths to ensure in-person signatures for major legislation, flying documents to South Korea and St. Croix, according to FOX News 2024 reporting.

Evidence contradicts Trump’s blanket claim. Photographic proof exists of Biden signing many documents, including executive orders, as documented by Newsweek on Monday. Similar scrutiny of Trump’s own executive orders from his first and second terms reveals consistent signatures, suggesting autopen use, per Fox News and Daily Mail analyses. The Heritage Foundation recently alleged widespread autopen use under Biden, but offered no definitive proof that pardons specifically were affected.

Legal scholars doubt Trump’s declaration holds weight. “There’s no precedent for this,” said a constitutional law professor quoted by The Independent. “Autopen signatures are legally binding unless proven to lack presidential intent.” Trump himself acknowledged the issue’s uncertainty Sunday, telling reporters aboard Air Force One that courts would decide, ABC News reported.

The controversy echoes broader attacks on Biden’s presidency. Trump’s post also claimed the Jan. 6 committee members committed “major crimes,” hinting at potential retribution now that their pardons are, in his view, voided. Critics slammed the move as authoritarian, with one Yahoo News commenter calling it “dictator s***.” Supporters, including Vice President JD Vance and Elon Musk, backed Trump’s narrative on social media, per The Express Tribune.

It is not known if a court will step in to make any rulings on this matter.

community logo
Join the Dave Bondy Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
September 12, 2026
Michigan schools have lost more than 100,000 students in just nine years, but somehow, they’ve added more than 35,000 full-time employees.

Michigan schools have lost more than 100,000 students in just nine years, but somehow, they’ve added more than 35,000 full-time employees.

00:01:21
September 09, 2026
E-bike crashes involving kids are getting attention in Michigan — and now a state lawmaker wants tougher rules. Would new age restrictions go too far? Michigan EBikes news

E-bike crashes involving kids are getting attention in Michigan — and now a state lawmaker wants tougher rules. Would new age restrictions go too far? #Michigan #EBikes #news

00:01:04
Gladwin mayor challenges city administrator contract clause, calls it a ‘gag order’

Gladwin mayor challenges city administrator contract clause, calls it a ‘gag order’

00:13:48
post photo preview
DOJ threatens legal action against Ann Arbor Public Schools over student privacy policies
Federal officials say the district has 14 days to change a policy involving transgender students and parental access to education records

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — The U.S. Department of Justice is threatening legal action against Ann Arbor Public Schools unless the district changes policies that federal officials say violate parents’ rights under federal education privacy laws.

In a letter dated Sunday, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said the district has 14 days to address what it described as “substantial noncompliance” with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, known as FERPA, and the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment, or PPRA.

The dispute centers on Ann Arbor Public Schools’ Policy 5011, which addresses transgender and gender-nonconforming students.

According to the Justice Department, the U.S. Department of Education first raised concerns about the policy in July, arguing that it did not provide parents with full access to their children’s education records.

The Ann Arbor Board of Education amended the policy Aug. 26. However, federal officials said the revisions did not substantially change the policy. The Justice Department cited comments made by board members during the meeting as evidence that the changes were intended largely to clarify the policy rather than alter its effect.

The Department of Education determined Aug. 31 that the district remained out of substantial compliance with FERPA and PPRA and authorized the Justice Department to begin enforcement measures, according to the letter.

Federal officials are demanding that the district rescind Policy 5011 or revise it to comply with federal law.

Among the requested changes, the Justice Department wants the district to remove language directing school personnel to privately consult with students about requested names and pronouns. It also wants the district to obtain prior written parental consent before requiring minors to answer questions involving information protected under PPRA.

The federal government is also demanding that parents be given an opportunity to challenge, correct or seek deletion of information in their children’s education records that they believe is inaccurate or misleading. The letter specifically references records involving changes to a student’s name or gender markers and reports concerning a student’s legal name or gender.

The Justice Department also directed the district to review its policies and practices to ensure parents can inspect their children’s education records and exercise their rights under federal law.

If the district does not comply within the 14-day deadline, the Justice Department said the federal government could file a civil lawsuit and take other enforcement action related to conditions attached to federal education funding.

“This letter constitutes a formal demand and a final opportunity to cure before litigation is initiated,” the Justice Department wrote.

The letter was signed by Harmeet K. Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

The documents provided do not include a response from Ann Arbor Public Schools to the latest Justice Department demand.

Read full Article
September 14, 2026
News they don't want you to see
Monday September 14, 2026
Read full Article
September 11, 2026
Michigan High School Students depicts Charlie Kirk murder during school
School district is investigating

LIVONIA, Mich. — Livonia Public Schools says administrators at Churchill High School took action after becoming aware of a student’s reported depiction of the killing of Charlie Kirk.

According to information provided to Keeping it Real, a student reportedly arrived at Churchill High School dressed to depict Kirk being killed, including what appeared to be fake blood running down the student’s neck.

The incident raised questions about how the school responded and whether the depiction violated district policies.

A photograph of the student in the costume was subsequently posted to a non- affiliated

Churchill Instagram account, with the song “We Are Charlie Kirk.”

I have obtained a copy of the photo, but due to its disturbing nature, I have chosen not to publish it.

Keeping it Real contacted school officials seeking an explanation of what happened and how administrators handled the situation.

Stacy Jenkins, administrator of district communications, said Churchill High School officials learned about the situation at the beginning of the school day and acted quickly.

 

“Churchill High School administration was made aware of the situation at the start of the school day and swiftly addressed it with the student involved,” Jenkins said.

Jenkins acknowledged that the depiction was inappropriate.

“While we cannot prevent every poor choice a student may make, we can ensure that inappropriate behavior is addressed when our administration becomes aware — that is exactly what occurred in this situation,” Jenkins said. “The depiction was inappropriate and did not align with our expectations for student behavior.”

The district’s response does not specify what action was taken involving the student or whether disciplinary measures were imposed.

The incident comes amid heightened concerns about how schools handle depictions or references to real-world political violence, particularly when they involve students.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals