Dave Bondy
Politics • Culture • News
Michigan Republicans Introduce Bill to Ban Gender Transition Procedures for Minors
Michigan lawmakers introduce controversial plan affecting minors
May 12, 2025
post photo preview

LANSING — Michigan Republicans on Wednesday introduced a three-bill package that would ban gender transition procedures for minors, including hormone treatments, surgeries that alter genital appearance, and any surgeries resulting in sterilization. The bills, introduced by Rep. Brad Paquette (R-Niles) and Sen. Thomas Albert (R-Lowell), allow exceptions only for minors with medically verifiable disorders of sex development or life-threatening conditions.

 

 

"It is time for the experimentation on children in the name of care to come to an end," Paquette said during a press conference announcing the legislation. "Children are not born in the wrong body. No one has the right to maim a healthy child’s body to try to achieve the unachievable."

The legislation would also expand patients’ ability to seek damages for medical malpractice related to transition procedures and would require insurance companies to cover detransition care if they cover transition treatments.

 

 

Paquette and Albert's proposal follows a new review issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which expressed concerns about the safety and long-term effects of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and gender-related surgeries in minors. The procedures cited in the federal review would be prohibited under the Michigan legislation.

Paquette and Albert were joined by Prisha Mosley, a detransitioner living in Big Rapids, and Jamie Reed, a former case manager at the Washington University Transgender Center at St. Louis Children's Hospital, both outspoken critics of gender-affirming care.

"It is critical that legislative bodies step in to protect children in this state from these dangerous and reckless practices," Reed said. "I was complicit in harming patients because the protocol itself harms patients. There is no safe or legal way to sterilize a child, and there is no safe way to medically disrupt a functioning endocrine system."

The three bills were introduced in the Michigan House as House Bills 4466-4468 and referred to the House Committee on Health Policy.

Opposition from LGBTQ advocates and medical groups
Although no Michigan-specific organizations had immediately issued statements about the new bills as of Wednesday afternoon, LGBTQ rights groups and major medical organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association, have previously opposed similar bans introduced in other states.

They argue that gender-affirming care is evidence-based, medically necessary, and often critical for the mental health and well-being of transgender youth. Critics of such bans say denying access to care can lead to higher rates of depression and suicide among transgender adolescents.

Democratic leaders, who hold a majority in both the Michigan House and Senate, have not yet announced whether they will consider the legislation.

 

 

community logo
Join the Dave Bondy Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
September 16, 2026
Gas prices are climbing fast in Michigan, with some stations reaching nearly $5 a gallon. Here’s what’s driving the increase and what could happen next. Michigan GasPrices Economy

Gas prices are climbing fast in Michigan, with some stations reaching nearly $5 a gallon. Here’s what’s driving the increase and what could happen next.

#Michigan #GasPrices #Economy

00:01:17
September 12, 2026
Michigan schools have lost more than 100,000 students in just nine years, but somehow, they’ve added more than 35,000 full-time employees.

Michigan schools have lost more than 100,000 students in just nine years, but somehow, they’ve added more than 35,000 full-time employees.

00:01:21
September 09, 2026
E-bike crashes involving kids are getting attention in Michigan — and now a state lawmaker wants tougher rules. Would new age restrictions go too far? Michigan EBikes news

E-bike crashes involving kids are getting attention in Michigan — and now a state lawmaker wants tougher rules. Would new age restrictions go too far? #Michigan #EBikes #news

00:01:04
News they don't want you to see
Friday September 18, 2026
Read full Article
September 16, 2026
News they don't want you to see
Wednesday September 16, 2026
Read full Article
September 15, 2026
post photo preview
DOJ threatens legal action against Ann Arbor Public Schools over student privacy policies
Federal officials say the district has 14 days to change a policy involving transgender students and parental access to education records

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — The U.S. Department of Justice is threatening legal action against Ann Arbor Public Schools unless the district changes policies that federal officials say violate parents’ rights under federal education privacy laws.

In a letter dated Sunday, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said the district has 14 days to address what it described as “substantial noncompliance” with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, known as FERPA, and the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment, or PPRA.

The dispute centers on Ann Arbor Public Schools’ Policy 5011, which addresses transgender and gender-nonconforming students.

According to the Justice Department, the U.S. Department of Education first raised concerns about the policy in July, arguing that it did not provide parents with full access to their children’s education records.

The Ann Arbor Board of Education amended the policy Aug. 26. However, federal officials said the revisions did not substantially change the policy. The Justice Department cited comments made by board members during the meeting as evidence that the changes were intended largely to clarify the policy rather than alter its effect.

The Department of Education determined Aug. 31 that the district remained out of substantial compliance with FERPA and PPRA and authorized the Justice Department to begin enforcement measures, according to the letter.

Federal officials are demanding that the district rescind Policy 5011 or revise it to comply with federal law.

Among the requested changes, the Justice Department wants the district to remove language directing school personnel to privately consult with students about requested names and pronouns. It also wants the district to obtain prior written parental consent before requiring minors to answer questions involving information protected under PPRA.

The federal government is also demanding that parents be given an opportunity to challenge, correct or seek deletion of information in their children’s education records that they believe is inaccurate or misleading. The letter specifically references records involving changes to a student’s name or gender markers and reports concerning a student’s legal name or gender.

The Justice Department also directed the district to review its policies and practices to ensure parents can inspect their children’s education records and exercise their rights under federal law.

If the district does not comply within the 14-day deadline, the Justice Department said the federal government could file a civil lawsuit and take other enforcement action related to conditions attached to federal education funding.

“This letter constitutes a formal demand and a final opportunity to cure before litigation is initiated,” the Justice Department wrote.

The letter was signed by Harmeet K. Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

The documents provided do not include a response from Ann Arbor Public Schools to the latest Justice Department demand.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals