Dave Bondy
Politics • Culture • News
Breaking down Supreme Court Trump immunity decision
Supreme Court Decision on Trump's Immunity Sends Case Back to Lower Courts
July 01, 2024
post photo preview

WASHINGTON D.C. – The Supreme Court ruled Monday in Trump v. United States that a former president has substantial immunity from prosecution for official acts committed while in office but not for unofficial acts.

The Court sent the matter back down to a lower court, as the justices did not apply the ruling to whether or not former President Trump is immune from prosecution regarding actions related to efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

In a closely watched decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the determination of former President Donald Trump’s immunity must first be addressed by the lower courts. Chief Justice John Roberts, in the majority opinion, stated that the trial court must now assess which of Trump's alleged actions are protected under the new guidelines established by the high court.

I left mainstream media to bring you unique, straightforward news. Support my work by becoming a paid subscriber for $5 a month. You can cancel anytime. Help me keep this going!

 

 

Chief Justice Roberts emphasized that the trial court would require additional briefing to make this determination. "We accordingly remand to the District Court to determine in the first instance — with the benefit of briefing we lack — whether Trump’s conduct in this area qualifies as official or unofficial," Roberts wrote. He criticized the previous lower court rulings for their lack of detailed factual analysis when rejecting Trump’s immunity claims and countered a dissenting opinion from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who argued for a more comprehensive definition of presidential immunity.

Click here for the complete decision from the Supreme Court.

In a forceful dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor criticized the majority opinion, asserting that it effectively places the President above the law. "Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends," Sotomayor wrote. She warned that this ruling could irrevocably damage the relationship between the President and the American people, making the President akin to a "king above the law." Concluding her dissent without the customary “respectfully” language, she wrote, “With fear for our democracy, I dissent.”

Share

Chief Justice Roberts clarified that while presidents require immunity for their official acts, this immunity is not all-encompassing. "The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official. The President is not above the law," Roberts wrote. He added that Congress cannot criminalize the President’s conduct in executing the responsibilities of the Executive Branch as defined by the Constitution.

Trump released the following statement:

 

The decision, which was 6-3 along conservative-liberal lines, complicates the legal landscape for Trump, especially regarding the federal election subversion charges linked to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. The ruling overturns a February decision by a federal appeals court that had denied Trump any immunity for his alleged actions during the end of his presidency.

This ruling, while granting Trump some immunity for official acts, leaves open the possibility of prosecution for actions deemed unofficial, sending the case back to the lower courts for further examination. CNN is continuing to review the implications of this landmark decision.

The Biden campaign says the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity “doesn’t change the facts,” and doubled down on allegations that former President Donald Trump “snapped” when he lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden.

“Donald Trump snapped after he lost the 2020 election and encouraged a mob to overthrow the results of a free and fair election,” a senior campaign adviser said in a statement shortly after the court issued the decision. “Trump is already running for president as a convicted felon for the very same reason he sat idly by while the mob violently attacked the Capitol: he thinks he’s above the law and is willing to do anything to gain and hold onto power for himself.” 

 

 

 

community logo
Join the Dave Bondy Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
1
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
October 24, 2025
BREAKING: Charges Dropped Against Michigan Duck Rescue Founders After DNR Case Collapses

The legal battle between the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Duck Rescue and Sanctuary has come to an end. with all charges dismissed against the couple who run the operation.

Matthew and Teresa Lyson, founders of the Salem Township sanctuary, had faced six criminal charges each after state officials accused them of keeping and caring for waterfowl without proper permits. This week, the Washtenaw County Prosecutor’s Office dismissed the cases in their entirety, following months of public scrutiny and growing political pressure.

“This is great news,” Lyson told Keeping It Real. “All charges against me and Teresa are 100 percent gone. It’s a done deal, and we get to start new.”

Background of the Case

The Michigan Duck Rescue and Sanctuary has operated for nearly two decades, caring for injured or abandoned ducks, geese, and other waterfowl — many of which suffer from “angel wing,” a deformity often caused by people feeding them improper food. The Lysons say their work ...

00:12:25
October 24, 2025
Grocery stores urging people to stop using pennies.

Grocery stores urging people to stop using pennies.

00:01:15
September 25, 2025
School board bans clapping....seriously

ALPENA, Mich. — A new rule banning applause and other displays of emotion at Alpena Public Schools board meetings has sparked pushback from community members who say the policy infringes on their free speech rights.

The board recently adopted a policy prohibiting clapping, cheering, booing, or any demonstrations from audience members during meetings. Board President Eric Lawson said the restriction is meant to prevent disruptions and maintain order.

“We’re doing our best to show respect to you all and make sure you have adequate time for your comments,” Lawson said during a recent meeting. “Please show the board a little respect as well.”

Not everyone in attendance agreed. Several residents voiced frustration, including one woman who argued that clapping constitutes symbolic speech protected under the First Amendment.

“Clapping is a universal symbolic action that typically expresses approval,” she said. “Up until one week ago, clapping was a regular occurrence at these ...

00:02:38
December 05, 2025
BREAKING: The Supreme Court will decide whether President Trump's birthright citizenship order violates the Constitution.

BREAKING: The Supreme Court will decide whether President Trump's birthright citizenship order violates the Constitution.

post photo preview
November 28, 2025
CALLING ALL FREE SUPPORTERS

if you are not a paid subscriber now is the time to sign up. Until Dec 1 I have lowered the price to become a paid supporter to $5 a month or $50 per year.
I want to grow. I want to hire an employee., I want to buy more equipment and travel more for my stories.
To do that I need more paid subscribers.
Click the link below to help me make this a reality.

November 26, 2025
Breaking News: Two National Guardsmen were shot in downtown DC today. Police say the scene is secure and a suspect is in custody. Avoid the area.

Breaking News: Two National Guardsmen were shot in downtown DC today. Police say the scene is secure and a suspect is in custody. Avoid the area.

post photo preview
News they don't want you to see
Monday December 15, 2025

Want to win a free furnace? Click here to enter the Bigfoot Pro Services furnace giveaway. This is for Michigan residents only. I trust Bigfoot for all my HVAC work.

 
 

Michigan Democrats Use Federal Vaccine Shake-Up to Push Sweeping Immunization Laws

LANSING, Mich. — The state has spent about $1.8 million to build 201 new electric vehicle chargers at multifamily properties through the first two rounds of grants given through the Clean Fuel and Charging Infrastructure program.

Michigan is 1.9 million registered EVs away from reaching the official goal of 2 millioni EV’s driving on public roads by 2030. There are around 85,000 registered EVs statewide.

Former President Joe Biden mandated that 66% of newly made vehicles be electric, but the Trump administration ended that mandate last week by rolling back the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards.

Researchers at Michigan State University say Michigan needs to spend $1 billion building EV chargers, CapCon previously reported. Click here to read more.


Push to Ralk nationwide walkie talkies make for great Christmas gifts for anyone. I love mine. Click here to get an extra 10% off for a limited time. Order now and get them for Christmashttps://rapidradios.com/discount/BONDY10

 

Click here to learn more about Rapid Radios. Get an extra 10% off now.

 

House passes legislation ending implicit bias training for healthcare workers

The Michigan House on Thursday approved legislation to end the state’s implicit bias training requirement for health professionals, a move toward eliminating a mandate from Gov. Gretchen Whitmer that Republicans describe as an unnecessary regulatory burden on medical providers.

House Bill 4915, sponsored by Rep. Matt Maddock, R-Milford, now moves to the Michigan Senate for consideration.

The legislation aims to amend Michigan law by removing implicit bias training from the licensing process for healthcare workers. The current requirement applies to more than 400,000 licensed professionals across over two dozen health fields, including doctors, nurses, dentists, psychologists, and other healthcare professionals. Click here to read more.

https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd2ea9316-1358-4bd7-97b5-7a04f92a0b2a_1100x100.pnghttps://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/d2ea9316-1358-4bd7-97b5-7a04f92a0b2a_1100x100.png (1100×100)","title":null,"type":null,"href":null,"belowTheFold":false,"topImage":false,"internalRedirect":null,"isProcessing":false,"align":null,"offset":false}" class="sizing-normal" alt="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/d2ea9316-1358-4bd7-97b5-7a04f92a0b2a_1100x100.png (1100×100)" title="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/d2ea9316-1358-4bd7-97b5-7a04f92a0b2a_1100x100.png (1100×100)" srcset="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!I5CQ!,w_424,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd2ea9316-1358-4bd7-97b5-7a04f92a0b2a_1100x100.png 424w, https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!I5CQ!,w_848,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd2ea9316-1358-4bd7-97b5-7a04f92a0b2a_1100x100.png 848w, https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!I5CQ!,w_1272,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd2ea9316-1358-4bd7-97b5-7a04f92a0b2a_1100x100.png 1272w, https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!I5CQ!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd2ea9316-1358-4bd7-97b5-7a04f92a0b2a_1100x100.png 1456w" sizes="100vw">
 

Lawsuit Claims Troubled Man’s Interactions with ChatGPT Led to Murder of Mother, Suicid

OpenAI and Microsoft are facing a lawsuit claims the massively popular AI chatbot ChatGPT contributed to a Connecticut man killing his mother and then himself in August.

Bloomberg reports that a lawsuit alleges that conversations with OpenAI’s ChatGPT chatbot played a role in a horrific murder-suicide in Greenwich, Connecticut that occurred in August. The legal action, which names both OpenAI and its major investor Microsoft as defendants, centers around the actions of 56-year-old Stein-Erik Soelberg, who had reportedly been engaging with the AI chatbot for months about paranoid delusions of being under surveillance and targeted for assassination. Click here to read more.

 

AWAY WITH THE MANGER: How the Left Tries to Weaponize Christmas Against Trump

This year, Catholics in Massachusetts are protesting President Donald Trump’s immigratoin policies by swapping “Away in a Manger” for “Away With the Manger.”

This marks yet another instance of Trump opponents weaponizing the Christmas story to demonize immigration enforcement by claiming Jesus was a refugee and suggesting Immigration and Customs Enforcement would have arrested and deported the Christ child in the manger.

The Catholic priest at St. Susanna Parish in Dedham, Massachusetts, set up a classic nativity scene with shepherds, sheep, wise men, and … a sign reading “ICE was here” in the place where Mary, Joseph, and baby Jesus would normally be. While the Catholic leadership opposed this “divisive political messaging,” the Rev. Stephen Josoma blamed the Trump administration for any division. Click here to read more.

 

 

‘Gross attack’: Criminal illegal migrant ‘savagely’ bites ICE officer, DHS says

WASHINGTON (TNND) — A criminal illegal migrant bit an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer while the agent was arresting him in Louisiana, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced.

DHS, which condoned the “gross” and “vicious” attack, identified the suspect as Maximiliano Perez-Perez.

“This criminal illegal alien is being charged with assault after he savagely bit a law enforcement officer in an attempt to evade arrest,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said on Friday in a news release.

“DHS law enforcement is facing a 1,150% increase in assaults against them and an 8,000% increase in death threats,” she added. “This is the reality of what our ICE officers are facing every day as they go to work to simply do their job and enforce the law. “Many of these assaults, including biting and vehicle rammings, are happening as a direct result of sanctuary politicians encouraging illegal aliens to evade arrest.”

Click here to read more.

Read full Article
December 12, 2025
EXCLUSIVE: Court records reveal multiple charges filed against Saginaw Intermediate Schools bus assistant
The charges stem from allegations involving a special education student and incidents prosecutors say occurred on a school bus.

SAGINAW, Mich. A Saginaw Intermediate School District bus assistant is facing multiple criminal sexual conduct charges after prosecutors allege he repeatedly engaged in inappropriate contact with a special education student while working for the school district, according to court records filed in Saginaw County District Court.

Morris Holmes is charged with several counts of criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree. The charges stem from alleged incidents that prosecutors say occurred over a period of several weeks in the fall of 2025 while Holmes was employed by the Saginaw Intermediate School District.

 
Picture from Saginaw ISD

According to felony complaints filed in district court, prosecutors allege Holmes engaged in repeated inappropriate contact with a student who was receiving special education services through the district. Michigan law classifies criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree as a high court misdemeanor when a school employee, substitute, contractor, or service provider has prohibited contact with a student receiving special education services from the same district.

Saginaw ISD Superintendent Dr. Jeffrey Collier released the following statement:

 

Court records indicate the alleged conduct occurred between late October and late November of 2025 while Holmes was assigned as a bus assistant responsible for transporting students with developmental disabilities. Prosecutors allege the incidents took place on a school bus during regular transportation routes.


 

According to bond documents filed in circuit court, the alleged incidents were captured by a video camera installed inside the school bus. Prosecutors state they reviewed video evidence that they say shows alleged inappropriate contact occurring on 19 separate days during the time period outlined in the charging documents.

Court records state Holmes was interviewed during the investigation. According to the bond recommendation, Holmes admitted to touching the student and told investigators he believed the contact was intended to calm the individual.

The bond filing further states that school administrators reported Holmes had specifically requested to be assigned to a bus serving individuals with developmental disabilities. Court documents indicate Holmes was placed on leave from his position with the school district following the allegations and the subsequent investigation.

Prosecutors argue in court filings that the likelihood of conviction is high due to the presence of video evidence and Holmes’ statements during the investigation. The bond recommendation also references Holmes’ prior criminal history, which includes a domestic violence conviction from 1998 and a disorderly conduct related conviction from 2024.

As part of pretrial proceedings, prosecutors are requesting a 250,000 dollar cash or surety bond. If Holmes is able to post bond, prosecutors are asking the court to impose several conditions, including GPS monitoring and restrictions that would prohibit contact with any schools.

Criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree carries a potential penalty of up to two years in jail and a fine of up to 500 dollars under Michigan law. Court records also note that mandatory testing for sexually transmitted diseases may be ordered if there is a conviction.

The felony complaints include notices related to the Michigan Sex Offender Registration Act. Any registration requirement would be determined later in the legal process and would depend on factors including the nature of the conviction and other criteria outlined in state law.

Holmes is expected to be arraigned in district court, with additional hearings anticipated as the case proceeds through the Saginaw County court system. No trial date has been set.

As with all criminal cases, the charges are allegations. Holmes is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

 
 
 
 
 
Read full Article
December 12, 2025
EXCLUSIVE: Court records reveal multiple charges filed against Saginaw Intermediate Schools bus assistant
The charges stem from allegations involving a special education student and incidents prosecutors say occurred on a school bus.

SAGINAW, Mich. A Saginaw Intermediate School District bus assistant is facing multiple criminal sexual conduct charges after prosecutors allege he repeatedly engaged in inappropriate contact with a special education student while working for the school district, according to court records filed in Saginaw County District Court.

Morris Holmes is charged with several counts of criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree. The charges stem from alleged incidents that prosecutors say occurred over a period of several weeks in the fall of 2025 while Holmes was employed by the Saginaw Intermediate School District.

 
Picture from Saginaw ISD

According to felony complaints filed in district court, prosecutors allege Holmes engaged in repeated inappropriate contact with a student who was receiving special education services through the district. Michigan law classifies criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree as a high court misdemeanor when a school employee, substitute, contractor, or service provider has prohibited contact with a student receiving special education services from the same district.

Saginaw ISD Superintendent Dr. Jeffrey Collier released the following statement:

 

Court records indicate the alleged conduct occurred between late October and late November of 2025 while Holmes was assigned as a bus assistant responsible for transporting students with developmental disabilities. Prosecutors allege the incidents took place on a school bus during regular transportation routes.


 

According to bond documents filed in circuit court, the alleged incidents were captured by a video camera installed inside the school bus. Prosecutors state they reviewed video evidence that they say shows alleged inappropriate contact occurring on 19 separate days during the time period outlined in the charging documents.

Court records state Holmes was interviewed during the investigation. According to the bond recommendation, Holmes admitted to touching the student and told investigators he believed the contact was intended to calm the individual.

The bond filing further states that school administrators reported Holmes had specifically requested to be assigned to a bus serving individuals with developmental disabilities. Court documents indicate Holmes was placed on leave from his position with the school district following the allegations and the subsequent investigation.

Prosecutors argue in court filings that the likelihood of conviction is high due to the presence of video evidence and Holmes’ statements during the investigation. The bond recommendation also references Holmes’ prior criminal history, which includes a domestic violence conviction from 1998 and a disorderly conduct related conviction from 2024.

As part of pretrial proceedings, prosecutors are requesting a 250,000 dollar cash or surety bond. If Holmes is able to post bond, prosecutors are asking the court to impose several conditions, including GPS monitoring and restrictions that would prohibit contact with any schools.

Criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree carries a potential penalty of up to two years in jail and a fine of up to 500 dollars under Michigan law. Court records also note that mandatory testing for sexually transmitted diseases may be ordered if there is a conviction.

The felony complaints include notices related to the Michigan Sex Offender Registration Act. Any registration requirement would be determined later in the legal process and would depend on factors including the nature of the conviction and other criteria outlined in state law.

Holmes is expected to be arraigned in district court, with additional hearings anticipated as the case proceeds through the Saginaw County court system. No trial date has been set.

As with all criminal cases, the charges are allegations. Holmes is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

 
 
 
 
 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals