Dave Bondy
News • Politics • Culture
Breaking down Supreme Court Trump immunity decision
Supreme Court Decision on Trump's Immunity Sends Case Back to Lower Courts
July 01, 2024
post photo preview

WASHINGTON D.C. – The Supreme Court ruled Monday in Trump v. United States that a former president has substantial immunity from prosecution for official acts committed while in office but not for unofficial acts.

The Court sent the matter back down to a lower court, as the justices did not apply the ruling to whether or not former President Trump is immune from prosecution regarding actions related to efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

In a closely watched decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the determination of former President Donald Trump’s immunity must first be addressed by the lower courts. Chief Justice John Roberts, in the majority opinion, stated that the trial court must now assess which of Trump's alleged actions are protected under the new guidelines established by the high court.

I left mainstream media to bring you unique, straightforward news. Support my work by becoming a paid subscriber for $5 a month. You can cancel anytime. Help me keep this going!

 

 

Chief Justice Roberts emphasized that the trial court would require additional briefing to make this determination. "We accordingly remand to the District Court to determine in the first instance — with the benefit of briefing we lack — whether Trump’s conduct in this area qualifies as official or unofficial," Roberts wrote. He criticized the previous lower court rulings for their lack of detailed factual analysis when rejecting Trump’s immunity claims and countered a dissenting opinion from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who argued for a more comprehensive definition of presidential immunity.

Click here for the complete decision from the Supreme Court.

In a forceful dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor criticized the majority opinion, asserting that it effectively places the President above the law. "Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends," Sotomayor wrote. She warned that this ruling could irrevocably damage the relationship between the President and the American people, making the President akin to a "king above the law." Concluding her dissent without the customary “respectfully” language, she wrote, “With fear for our democracy, I dissent.”

Share

Chief Justice Roberts clarified that while presidents require immunity for their official acts, this immunity is not all-encompassing. "The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official. The President is not above the law," Roberts wrote. He added that Congress cannot criminalize the President’s conduct in executing the responsibilities of the Executive Branch as defined by the Constitution.

Trump released the following statement:

 

The decision, which was 6-3 along conservative-liberal lines, complicates the legal landscape for Trump, especially regarding the federal election subversion charges linked to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. The ruling overturns a February decision by a federal appeals court that had denied Trump any immunity for his alleged actions during the end of his presidency.

This ruling, while granting Trump some immunity for official acts, leaves open the possibility of prosecution for actions deemed unofficial, sending the case back to the lower courts for further examination. CNN is continuing to review the implications of this landmark decision.

The Biden campaign says the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity “doesn’t change the facts,” and doubled down on allegations that former President Donald Trump “snapped” when he lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden.

“Donald Trump snapped after he lost the 2020 election and encouraged a mob to overthrow the results of a free and fair election,” a senior campaign adviser said in a statement shortly after the court issued the decision. “Trump is already running for president as a convicted felon for the very same reason he sat idly by while the mob violently attacked the Capitol: he thinks he’s above the law and is willing to do anything to gain and hold onto power for himself.” 

 

 

 

community logo
Join the Dave Bondy Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
1
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Pelosi turning on Biden

Now Pelosi is turning on Biden.

00:00:22
Update on Biden’s future.

Reports: President Biden to travel to Camp David to discuss campaign.

00:00:39
Take a close look at this from the debate

Most people did not see this. This aired for only a few seconds on CNN. Take a look at Biden getting help from his wife step off of the stage.

00:00:17
Now this...
post photo preview
Trump Supreme Court decision

Supreme Court rules former President Trump had absolute immunity for official acts as President, but not unofficial acts

post photo preview
Why I Left Mainstream Media and Why I Need Your Support

Hello everyone,

After 25 years in the mainstream media, I made the tough but necessary decision to walk away from a high-paying career. Why? Because I believe you deserve the truth. I started my own independent journalism company to dig deep into the stories that mainstream outlets often ignore or bury.

On Locals, I can share uncensored, algorithm-free content. This platform allows me to deliver the real stories directly to you, without interference from social media companies. I focus on topics rooted in my values: God, family, and country.

Here's why your support is essential:

Unbiased Reporting: I provide in-depth, honest journalism that you won't find elsewhere.
Transparency: I'm not funded by big pharma or large corporations. Your support keeps this mission alive.
Community: By joining my Locals community, you become part of a movement dedicated to transparency and integrity in journalism.
For just $5 a month, you can help ensure that real news continues to reach the public.

...

post photo preview
News they don't want you to see
Wednesday July 3, 2024

I need your help to keep this going out free to everyone. Sign up as a paid subscriber to help me fight the narratives and bring you real news. It’s $5 a month, and you can quit anytime. Subscribers get bonus exclusive content weekly.

 

 

 
 

LANSING, Mich - Michigan has sanctioned a speech-language pathologist for not completing implicit bias training, as required by a 2020 directive from Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

Michiganders licensed by the state across 26 occupations must complete implicit bias training to renew a professional license.

New applicants must complete two hours of implicit bias training within the previous five years. Renewing licensees or registrants must complete one hour of implicit bias training for each year of their license cycle.

The Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs fined a speech-language pathologist $1,500 for not completing the continuing education requirement or the implicit bias training, according to an internal document Do No Harm, an organization that opposes diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, sent CapCon. Do No Harm obtained the Oct. 19, 2023, affidavit of a state compliance officer, as well as other documents, through a Freedom of Information Act request. The therapist was placed on probation on the condition of completing the required number of hours as well as implicit bias training. Failure to pay the fine and comply with the training requirement will result in the state terminating the person’s professional license. Click here to read more.

 

LANSING, MICH - Dozens of legal Michigan voters last week filed a state Supreme Court lawsuit against Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Attorney General Dana Nessel, and state election officials, aiming to overturn recent election law changes.

The lawsuit centers on “unlawful guidance for elections” issued by Benson since she took office, and Proposal 2 approved by voters in 2022 that Michigan Supreme Court justices ordered to appear on the ballot.

“Petitioners have reason to believe (Proposal 2) resulted in a number of unconstitutional revisions to the Michigan Constitution, and subsequent new election laws, making it impossible for the State of Michigan to guarantee all legally eligible Michigan voters a free, fair, lawful, secure, and transparent election process in the 2024 elections,” the lawsuit reads.

The group of 130 voters points to seven separate court rulings that have found Benson’s election guidance unlawful. Those court rulings, however, resulted in zero consequences for Benson’s failures. Click here to read more.

 

 

WASHINGTON D.C. - Nearly half of student loan borrowers have not made repayments since billing resumed last year, according to The New York Times.

Student loan repayments were put on a three-year pause during the pandemic, allowing borrowers to put their payments on hold until billing resumed in 2023, according to the Federal Student Aid website. There were nearly 19 million borrowers who were not making monthly payments at the end of March, six months after the end of the pause, according to the NYT. Some borrowers say they cannot afford to make payments and others stated they are caught up in “bureaucratic snafus,” while others are benefiting from an “on-ramp” transition period that extends through September, the NYT reported. During this time, borrowers who make late payments will not be reported on as delinquent. Click here to read more.

 

BARRON COUNTY, MN - The Barron County sheriff reports a 71-year-old grandfather drowned over the weekend in Mikana, Wisconsin, after helping a grandchild who was struggling in the water.

Family has identified the victim as Larry Quillen of Mikana.

“He was always very giving,” said sister-in-law Mary Tuttle. “Absolutely a hero.”

Larry Quillen was fishing and swimming with the grandkids Saturday afternoon near the dam; both kids were wearing life jackets on the river, according to the family.

“Unfortunately, one of them slipped and started to drown, and Larry went right in to get him. He got them out,” Tuttle said. The family is trying to understand what happened to Larry Quillen next.

The Barron County Sheriff’s Office said for an unknown reason, the grandfather went under and drowned.

Family was very important to Larry Quillen, according to his loved ones. They called him their “Papa Bear.”

“He was my rock. He took such good care of me. I loved him so much, I don’t know what I’m going to do without him,” said Carol Quillen, Larry’s wife. “He was always thoughtful; he was always helping someone.” Click here to read more.

 

WASHINGTON D.C. - On the menu today: Now it can be told that plenty of people close to President Joe Biden have seen “a marked incidence of cognitive decline” in the past six months, that “an awful lot of major Democrats” have seen it but have publicly insisted that Biden is fine, and that Biden’s senior officials “curate the information being presented [to Biden] in an effort to avoid provoking a negative reaction.” Last week, I wrote that Joe Biden is overdue to move to a retirement home. Now we learn that the White House is effectively operating like a retirement home — “Don’t tell Grandpa the bad news, it will only get him agitated.” It is more than fair to ask who’s really running the country if Biden has become so mentally, emotionally, and physically fragile that he can’t handle being told bad news. And yet for Democrats, the objective between now and Election Day is to figure out how to get you to forget what you’ve seen and heard over the past four days or so. Click here to read more.

Read full Article
post photo preview
New Epstein documents released
Epstein Victims Branded as Prostitutes and Drug Addicts by Prosecutor, Unsealed Documents Reveal

Newly unsealed documents have revealed that two teenage girls, allegedly subjected to sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein, were separately branded as prostitutes and drug addicts by a prosecutor. Approximately 175 pages of transcripts from a 2006 grand jury investigation into allegations against Epstein were released to the public on Monday afternoon. This unsealing follows Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signing a bill in February, enabling Circuit Judge Luis Delgado to execute the order.

Delgado emphasized that the details documented will be “outrageous to decent people.”

Click here to read all of the documents for yourself.

 

The jury heard evidence that Epstein, who took his own life while incarcerated in 2019, had raped girls as young as 14 years old at his mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, according to the transcripts.

Palm Beach County prosecutors now face widespread condemnation for their treatment of two of Epstein’s alleged young female victims, who were belittled and treated like criminals during the investigation.

Support my mission of independent journalism. I walked away from my high-paying job in the mainstream media to work for all of you. Become a paid subscriber for $5 a month. Quit at any time. Join my mission!

“It was just atrocious the way they handled it,” Spencer Kuvin, an attorney representing one of the alleged underage girls who testified, told CBS as he read the transcripts.

A search of Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion on El Brillo Way led to his 2008 indictment. During the grand jury proceedings, prosecutors called upon an alleged Epstein victim, who was 14 years old at the time her stepmother reported that the teenager had received $300 to massage an older man on Palm Beach Island.

The girl recounted that Epstein’s assistant asked her to strip to her underwear before entering the room and massaging Epstein. She then agreed to allow him to use a vibrator on her for an additional $100, as per the documents.

Prosecutors continued to interrogate the girl, who had turned 15 by the time of her testimony, suggesting she “had a problem with drugs.” They also questioned her about a body piercing and a social media post where she lied about her age, income, and bragged about shoplifting. The teen testified that the post was “a joke.”

“You aware that you committed a crime?” one of the prosecutors, Lanna Belohlavek, asked the witness.

The girl responded: “Now I am. I didn’t know it was a crime when I was doing it. Now, I guess it’s prostitution or something like that.”

Another witness, an investigator, was asked whether the 14-year-old’s social media account included pictures of “her in skimpy attire, drinking alcohol and sexually provocative photos.”

“Yes, ma’am,” they responded.

The second girl to testify before the grand jury stated she was just 16 years old when she first went to Epstein’s mansion. “He was well aware of my age from the very beginning,” she said. Her 10th and final encounter occurred the day before her 18th birthday when Epstein initiated intercourse. She testified that she didn’t want to engage in the act but did not ask him to stop.

“You understand that you, in effect, were committing prostitution yourself,” a prosecutor asked. “Yes,” the witness replied.

Epstein was arrested, booked, and released on bond following the grand jury’s indictment on one charge of solicitation of prostitution.

The official report is that Epstein killed himself, many dought that official cause of death.

Read full Article
post photo preview
New Epstein documents released
Epstein Victims Branded as Prostitutes and Drug Addicts by Prosecutor, Unsealed Documents Reveal

Newly unsealed documents have revealed that two teenage girls, allegedly subjected to sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein, were separately branded as prostitutes and drug addicts by a prosecutor. Approximately 175 pages of transcripts from a 2006 grand jury investigation into allegations against Epstein were released to the public on Monday afternoon. This unsealing follows Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signing a bill in February, enabling Circuit Judge Luis Delgado to execute the order.

Delgado emphasized that the details documented will be “outrageous to decent people.”

Click here to read all of the documents for yourself.

The jury heard evidence that Epstein, who took his own life while incarcerated in 2019, had raped girls as young as 14 years old at his mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, according to the transcripts.

Palm Beach County prosecutors now face widespread condemnation for their treatment of two of Epstein’s alleged young female victims, who were belittled and treated like criminals during the investigation.

Support my mission of independent journalism. I walked away from my high-paying job in the mainstream media to work for all of you. Become a paid subscriber for $5 a month. Quit at any time. Join my mission!

“It was just atrocious the way they handled it,” Spencer Kuvin, an attorney representing one of the alleged underage girls who testified, told CBS as he read the transcripts.

A search of Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion on El Brillo Way led to his 2008 indictment. During the grand jury proceedings, prosecutors called upon an alleged Epstein victim, who was 14 years old at the time her stepmother reported that the teenager had received $300 to massage an older man on Palm Beach Island.

The girl recounted that Epstein’s assistant asked her to strip to her underwear before entering the room and massaging Epstein. She then agreed to allow him to use a vibrator on her for an additional $100, as per the documents.

Prosecutors continued to interrogate the girl, who had turned 15 by the time of her testimony, suggesting she “had a problem with drugs.” They also questioned her about a body piercing and a social media post where she lied about her age, income, and bragged about shoplifting. The teen testified that the post was “a joke.”

“You aware that you committed a crime?” one of the prosecutors, Lanna Belohlavek, asked the witness.

The girl responded: “Now I am. I didn’t know it was a crime when I was doing it. Now, I guess it’s prostitution or something like that.”

Another witness, an investigator, was asked whether the 14-year-old’s social media account included pictures of “her in skimpy attire, drinking alcohol and sexually provocative photos.”

“Yes, ma’am,” they responded.

The second girl to testify before the grand jury stated she was just 16 years old when she first went to Epstein’s mansion. “He was well aware of my age from the very beginning,” she said. Her 10th and final encounter occurred the day before her 18th birthday when Epstein initiated intercourse. She testified that she didn’t want to engage in the act but did not ask him to stop.

“You understand that you, in effect, were committing prostitution yourself,” a prosecutor asked. “Yes,” the witness replied.

Epstein was arrested, booked, and released on bond following the grand jury’s indictment on one charge of solicitation of prostitution.

The official report is that Epstein killed himself, many dought that official cause of death.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals