Dave Bondy
Politics • Culture • News
The truth behind Kamala Harris $25,000 first time homebuyer program
Harris’s Housing Plan Pushes Government Dependency Over Personal Responsibility
October 08, 2024
post photo preview

Kamala Harris, the Vice President of the United States, has been promoting an ambitious plan to provide a $25,000 grant to first-time homebuyers, specifically targeting those who are considered "first-generation" homebuyers. At first glance, this plan may appear to be an effort to help Americans achieve the American Dream of homeownership, but when examined closely, it raises significant concerns about fairness, economic feasibility, and the deeper implications of government intervention in the housing market.

The proposal’s focus on first-generation homebuyers—those whose parents or guardians never owned a home—paints it as a program aimed at combating historic injustices and systemic racial barriers to homeownership. However, many critics, especially within conservative circles, see it as yet another flawed attempt at wealth redistribution, designed more to win political points than to solve the real problems of America’s housing crisis.

The Mechanics of the Program: A Gimmick or a Real Solution?

Harris’s plan would provide up to $25,000 for down payment assistance to first-time, first-generation homebuyers. While helping people afford the high upfront costs of purchasing a home may sound like a noble goal, it ignores some key issues:

  1. Who Foots the Bill?: The obvious question is where this money will come from. As with most federal programs, it’s likely that taxpayers will be footing the bill, which means hardworking Americans will be funding a program that selectively benefits a small group of individuals. This approach fundamentally shifts responsibility from the individual to the government, signaling another step toward the government attempting to control outcomes in the free market.

  2. Favoritism Over Fairness: The plan’s emphasis on first-generation buyers raises fairness concerns. Why should a first-generation homebuyer be prioritized over someone whose parents owned a modest home but who is struggling to buy one themselves? This policy picks winners and losers based not on need but on lineage—a move that undermines the principles of fairness and equal opportunity.

  3. Perverse Incentives: By focusing only on first-generation buyers, the plan could inadvertently create a disincentive for families to encourage homeownership among their children. If a parent buys a home, their children would be excluded from these government benefits in the future. This sets up a bizarre scenario where families might feel penalized for making responsible financial decisions, such as purchasing a home.

  4. Inflating Housing Prices: Injecting $25,000 into the housing market for certain buyers could artificially inflate prices, making homes even more unaffordable for those who don’t qualify for the program. Basic economics tells us that when you flood a market with money—especially in areas where housing inventory is already low—you drive prices up, worsening the affordability crisis for everyone. This has already been seen in markets where well-meaning government interventions have backfired, creating price hikes and bubbles.

 

Support my independent journalism by becoming a paid subscriber by clicking red button below.

 

 

The Real Goal: Wealth Redistribution

Many conservatives argue that this plan, while couched in terms of helping people achieve the American Dream, is nothing more than an elaborate form of wealth redistribution. By targeting specific racial and economic groups, the plan embodies the progressive left’s worldview that the government’s role is to correct perceived historical injustices through large-scale wealth transfers.

There’s no doubt that some communities, especially minority communities, have faced barriers to homeownership in the past. However, the solution to these problems is not to hand out government money selectively but to create a fair and open market where individuals succeed based on merit, hard work, and personal responsibility. Harris’s plan, instead of empowering individuals, promotes dependency on government aid.

This is a slippery slope that America has been sliding down for years. First, it was healthcare, then education, and now housing. With each step, the government assumes more control, and Americans become more dependent. At what point do we stop this encroachment on personal freedom and start holding people accountable for their choices?

A Better Solution: Deregulation, Not Handouts

Rather than throwing money at the problem, a more effective solution would be to address the root causes of the housing crisis—excessive regulation, zoning laws, and government intervention in the free market. America’s housing market is stifled by red tape that artificially restricts the supply of housing, particularly in urban areas where prices are skyrocketing. If we truly want to make homeownership affordable for all Americans, the focus should be on creating more housing, not doling out grants that will ultimately increase demand without addressing supply.

Moreover, reducing taxes on middle-class families, rolling back onerous regulations, and fostering an environment where businesses can thrive would provide the kind of economic stability that allows individuals to save for down payments on their own, without needing government handouts.

Racial Wealth Gaps: The Left’s Talking Point

Harris and her supporters frequently cite racial wealth gaps as a justification for the plan, arguing that it will help address systemic disparities. While it is true that some racial disparities exist in homeownership rates, conservatives argue that focusing exclusively on race as a factor in government policy is both divisive and counterproductive. The idea that racial wealth gaps can be solved through government intervention ignores the importance of personal responsibility, financial literacy, and the role of individual decision-making in achieving financial success.

Many successful Black, Latino, and minority homeowners have achieved their success not because of government assistance but because of hard work, careful financial planning, and a commitment to bettering their own lives. Harris’s plan diminishes these achievements by suggesting that government grants, rather than personal effort, are the key to success

Conclusion: A Path to Dependency, Not Prosperity

Kamala Harris’s $25,000 first-time homebuyer plan may appear to be a well-intentioned effort to help Americans achieve homeownership, but at its core, it’s another step toward government overreach and wealth redistribution. Rather than empowering individuals to succeed on their own merit, this plan promotes dependency on government assistance, drives up housing costs, and creates perverse incentives that could harm the housing market in the long run.

If we truly want to make homeownership more accessible, the solution lies in freeing the market, reducing taxes and regulations, and fostering an economy where everyone—regardless of race or background—can succeed based on their own efforts. Government handouts may win votes, but they won’t solve America’s housing crisis. True freedom comes from opportunity, not dependency, and Kamala Harris’s plan misses that mark.

 
 
 
community logo
Join the Dave Bondy Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Law Enforcement Expert Shares Survival Tips For Attacks

There will be no live show today. Not feeling well. This is our new interview for all of you----

Keeping It Real with Dave Bondy is adding a new voice of authority to the team. John Hartman, a retired police chief with decades of experience in law enforcement, has joined as our legal and law enforcement expert.

Hartman’s career began in Pennsylvania, where he led one of the state’s regional police departments serving as many as ten communities across three counties. Under his leadership, the department handled complex cases and grew into a model for multi-municipality policing. He retired in 2018 but has remained active in training, investigations, and private consulting.
Learn more about his company here: https://johndalehartmaninvestigations.com/

Beyond his time as chief, Hartman has trained thousands of officers, school staff, and even military personnel in rapid deployment and active threat response. He helped pioneer programs focused on school shootings, church security, and workplace ...

00:25:56
School Board Member Alleges Information Withheld in Proposed $40 Million School Sale

SWARTZ CREEK, Mich. — Tensions flared at a recent Swartz Creek School Board meeting after a board member claimed he was not given key information about a potential $40 million sale of Moorish Elementary School to a state-backed development project.

Board member Chuck Melki alleged that documents related to the proposed sale were withheld from him and the public. The school sits within a large industrial site in Mundy Township where the state of Michigan has already spent $259 million to clear land for a potential factory project. Despite the investment, several companies have declined to move in, leaving the land vacant.

“I wasn’t given all the information about the possible sale of this school,” Melki said during the meeting, adding that he recently learned documents existed as far back as May indicating the property could be sold. He accused the district’s former superintendent, who has since left for another district, of withholding the paperwork.

Board member Carrie ...

00:04:37
Michigan’s Failing $259 Million Mega Site Project Could Now Claim a $40M School

The state of Michigan has spent over $259 million in taxpayer money buying land in Genesee County for a “mega-site” project aimed at attracting a large company, but no firm has committed to the site. A proposed $55 billion project recently fell through, leaving the land vacant. Now, officials are considering buying Morris Elementary School for $40 million to add to the site, despite uncertainty over whether a company will ever build there. Supporters say it could bring jobs, while critics argue it’s a waste of public funds.

00:06:01
BREAKING: National Guard coming to Chicago

President Trump announces National Guard will be deployed to Chicago

post photo preview
The stock market is up more than 700 points and CNN seems upset about it.

The stock market is up more than 700 points and CNN seems upset about it.

post photo preview
No show tonight

No show tonight

post photo preview
Maxwell Breaks Silence: What She Really Said About Clinton, Trump and Epstein’s Death
The new tapes just released.

WASHINGTON — Ghislaine Maxwell, the disgraced socialite serving a 20-year sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation, spoke at length about her ties to former President Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and her view of Epstein’s death in newly released transcripts of her proffer sessions with the Department of Justice. She also addressed persistent rumors of a secret “list” of Epstein’s powerful associates, calling the notion a myth.

Click here to listen to the interview.

The interviews, conducted July 24–25, 2025, under a proffer agreement, mark the first time Maxwell has directly addressed federal investigators since her conviction. The transcripts provide a rare glimpse into her perspective on Epstein’s network and the scandals that continue to swirl around his name.

 

Maxwell on Donald Trump

Maxwell said her connections to Trump predated her relationship with Epstein. She recalled that in 1990, while helping her father Robert Maxwell with business matters in New York, she may have briefly met Trump. “My father was friendly with him and liked him very much,” she told investigators, adding that her father also admired Ivana Trump.

She acknowledged attending events at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort but denied recruiting women there on Epstein’s behalf. “I really don’t believe it’s true,” she said when pressed about allegations that she approached women at the property. “In the realm of possibility, it could have [happened], but I have no memory of it”.

Maxwell on Bill Clinton

Maxwell described Clinton as a figure Epstein “greatly admired” and sought to impress. She said she saw Clinton at charity and academic gatherings but insisted he was “never inappropriate” and “never a participant” in Epstein’s sexual misconduct.

Clinton has acknowledged flying on Epstein’s private jet for philanthropic work but denied wrongdoing. Maxwell’s comments, while echoing his denials, underscore Epstein’s desire to cultivate relationships with political elites.

 

Maxwell on Jeffrey Epstein’s Death

The transcripts show Maxwell voicing deep skepticism about Epstein’s official cause of death. “I don’t believe he killed himself,” she told investigators. She suggested Epstein “had many enemies” and said there were “too many coincidences” surrounding the circumstances of his 2019 death in federal custody.

While she did not accuse anyone directly, Maxwell’s doubts echoed the widespread suspicion that Epstein’s death was not self-inflicted.

Maxwell on the Rumored ‘List’

Investigators also asked Maxwell about the long-rumored “list” of Epstein’s friends and associates — sometimes described in media accounts as a supposed ledger of influential figures tied to his activities. Maxwell dismissed the idea outright.

“I never kept such a list, and I never saw one,” she said, calling the notion a “media invention.” She added that Epstein’s social circle was broad and well-known through public appearances, flight logs, and society pages, but insisted there was no secret document cataloging who might have been complicit.

“People have imagined this massive hidden record,” she said, “but it simply didn’t exist in the way it has been described.”

 

Distancing Herself from Epstein

Maxwell continued to dispute prosecutors’ characterization of Epstein’s multimillion-dollar transfers to her. She claimed the money was tied to loans, business deals, and investments, not payments for recruiting underage girls. She described flipping real estate, investing in luxury cars, and earning banking licenses in the 1990s, portraying herself as a woman seeking financial independence rather than an accomplice.

“I always wanted to be independent, financially secure and work for myself,” she said.

Renewed Scrutiny

The release of Maxwell’s interviews is likely to reignite scrutiny of Epstein’s network. For years, questions have swirled about who knew what about his abuse and how far his influence extended. Clinton has denied any knowledge of criminal activity, while Trump has said he knew Epstein socially but “was not a fan.”

Maxwell’s denial of a “list” may quiet some speculation but is unlikely to end the fascination with Epstein’s high-profile ties. Her insistence that Clinton and Trump were not involved in abuse will not silence critics, especially given her conviction for enabling Epstein’s exploitation.

 

A Story That Refuses to Fade

Six years after Epstein’s death and more than two years into her sentence, Maxwell remains central to the scandal. Her interviews reflect both an attempt to defend her reputation and a refusal to accept the narrative prosecutors advanced.

“I’ve never had any problem to speak to anybody,” she told investigators at the outset of the interviews, noting that she had asked to meet with the government years earlier. “I offered myself and I kept asking.”

Now, with her words public, the controversy surrounding Epstein, Maxwell, and the powerful world they inhabited is once again thrust into the spotlight — with two former presidents and the specter of a rumored “list” ensuring the story remains alive.

Read full Article
News they don't want you to see
Thursday August 21, 2025

My kids don’t have cell phones. I stay in touch with them using my Rapid Radios. I love them: nationwide Coverage, 5-day battery life, walkie-talkies. Click here to order now and get an extra 10% off.

 

 

 
 

Michigan spends six figures begging residents not to commit suicide

The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services spent more than $3.1 million in advertising across social media on 68 media campaigns from 2024 to 2025, according to documents obtained through a records request.

The department ran ad campaigns on Facebook, Instagram, Youtube, Snapchat, TikTok and LinkedIn. The state of Michigan also spends taxpayer dollars to buy your attention through advertisements on gas pumps and highway billboards.

The documents show what state lawmakers can or should do with taxpayer money.

The state health department spent $111,260 from 2024-25 urging residents not to kill themselves. The funding was advertised for the suicide hotline. Click here to read more.

 

Extremely Promising’: New Vaccine Could Prevent Recurrence Of Deadly Colon, Pancreatic Cancer

A new experimental vaccine has been developed that appears to be successful in preventing recurrences of the deadly colorectal and pancreatic cancers.

A study led by the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California, Los Angeles, tested the ELI-002 2P vaccine on 25 patients previously treated for pancreatic and colorectal cancers.

The vaccine could “help prevent or delay cancer recurrence in high-risk patients whose tumors are driven by KRAS mutations, which are responsible for half of colorectal cancers and more than 90 percent of pancreatic cancers, researchers noted,” The Hill reported.

The patients were tested a year after the vaccine had been administered, and the average relapse-free survival times were significantly greater than historical norms.

Oncologist Dr. Thomas Marron told News Nation the results are “extremely promising. Pancreatic cancer and colon cancer are really terrible cancers, and oftentimes even if patients can have curative-intense surgery, unfortunately this cancer tends to come back as microscopic bits of the cancer have already spread. Click here to read more.

 

Education Dept places five Virginia school districts on high-alert status over transgender bathrooms

The Department of Education on Tuesday announced it was placing five northern Virginia school districts on "high-risk status" within the federal grant system, after they declined to obey the department's directive to change their policies regarding transgender students using bathrooms that align with their chosen gender identity.

The school districts made their respective decisions to reject the department's Voluntary Resolution Agreement last week.

The Education Department found last month that Arlington Public Schools, Alexandria City Public Schools, Fairfax County Public Schools, Loudoun County Public Schools and the Prince William County Public Schools violated Title IX by allowing students access to "intimate, sex-segregated facilities" based on the students' chosen gender identity instead of their biological sex. Click here to read more.

 

Trump vows admin won't approve wind or solar: 'Days of stupidity are over'

resident Donald Trump on Wednesday vowed that his administration would not approve wind or solar projects, calling the alternative energy sources part of the "scam of the century!"

Trump has long criticized the alternative energy forms, notably pointing to the impact of wind turbines on the bird population. Earlier this week, he called for stopping windmill operations due to an energy crunch.

"Any State that has built and relied on WINDMILLS and SOLAR for power are seeing RECORD BREAKING INCREASES IN ELECTRICITY AND ENERGY COSTS," Trum posted on Truth Social. "THE SCAM OF THE CENTURY! We will not approve wind or farmer destroying Solar. The days of stupidity are over in the USA!!! MAGA."

Last month, Trump called windmills a "con job" and warned European leaders against their production, in part due to them being made in China.

 

Man who tried to rape 7-year-old agrees to be castrated as part of plea deal

VERNON PARISH, La. - A Louisiana man agreed to be physically and chemically castrated as part of a plea deal.

Thirty-seven-year-old Thomas Allen McCartney, of Leesville, pleaded guilty Tuesday to attempted first-degree rape of a child under the age of 13.

As part of the plea deal, McCartney also agreed to serve 40 years in state prison, according to the Vernon Parish District Attorney’s Office.

When McCartney was arrested in 2023, authorities said he had been caught sexually abusing a 7-year-old girl. He was already a Tier 3 sex offender in Louisiana, having been previously convicted of attempted aggravated rape in 2011. Click here to read more.

Read full Article
News they don't want you to see
Wednesday August 20, 2025
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals